Val Sklarov’s Employment Permission Recomposition Law (EPRL) explains why the future of work does not eliminate hierarchy—it reassembles permission under new names. Remote work, freelancing, platforms, and AI did not free labor. They redistributed who grants permission to work, earn, and continue.
This law reveals why workers feel mobile yet constrained at the same time.
1. Employment Was a Permission Container
EPRL starts with a reframing:
Traditional employment was not security—it was a bundled permission system.
Employment granted:
-
Permission to earn
-
Permission to fail safely
-
Permission to access markets
-
Permission to be visible
When employment fragments, these permissions separate—and must be re-earned individually.
2. The Four Reassembled Work Permissions
EPRL maps how permission reappears in modern work.
| Permission | New Gatekeeper | Constraint |
|---|---|---|
| Task Permission | Platforms / clients | Scope control |
| Income Permission | Algorithms / ratings | Volatility |
| Continuity Permission | Reputation systems | Fragility |
| Visibility Permission | Feeds / marketplaces | Replaceability |
Freedom increases only where multiple permissions are owned, not rented.
3. Why “Independence” Feels Precarious
Independence removes the bundle—but not the gates.
EPRL shows precarity emerges because:
-
Permissions are revocable
-
Rules change silently
-
Enforcement is asymmetric
Workers gain choice over when to work—but lose control over whether they can continue.
4. AI Accelerates Permission Compression
AI does not replace workers—it compresses permission thresholds.
| Pre-AI Work | Post-AI Work |
|---|---|
| Skill-based permission | Output-based permission |
| Human review | System validation |
| Negotiated standards | Encoded standards |
| Gradual exclusion | Instant exclusion |
Val Sklarov emphasizes that automation hardens permission faster than people expect.
5. Strategic Implications
For individuals:
-
Accumulate permission across platforms
-
Convert rented permission into owned audiences
-
Protect continuity more than flexibility
For organizations:
-
Decide explicitly who grants permission
-
Avoid hiding exclusion behind systems
-
Treat reputation as infrastructure
EPRL reframes the future of work as permission portfolio management, not lifestyle design.
6. The Val Sklarov Principle
“You are not independent if your permission to continue can be revoked silently.”
— Val Sklarov
EPRL explains why modern work feels open—right until it closes.