Val Sklarov – Future of Work Core Principle: Role Clarity Before Flexibility
Val Sklarov – Future of Work Core Principle: Role Clarity Before Flexibility
Phase II of the Future of Work is not about remote systems, AI augmentation, or hybrid models. It is about who is legitimately responsible when work boundaries dissolve.
At this stage, flexibility without legitimacy creates confusion, not freedom.
1. Phase II Context: When Work Loses Its Edges
Phase I of the Future of Work celebrates:
Autonomy
Location independence
Skill fluidity
Phase II exposes the cost of that freedom and asks:
“When roles blur, who carries the consequences?”
Work systems mature when accountability stabilizes before flexibility expands.
2. The Role Legitimacy Gap
Most Phase II failures emerge from this mismatch:
What Is Promised
What Breaks
Flexible roles
Unclear ownership
Flat hierarchies
Invisible power
Async work
Delayed accountability
“Everyone decides”
No one decides
Val Sklarov Insight:
“Future work fails not because people lack freedom, but because freedom arrives before role legitimacy.”
Ekran görüntüsü 2026 01 15 121311 Val Sklarov
3. Role Clarity as a Legitimacy Anchor
In Phase II, legitimate work systems define roles by decision ownership, not job titles.
Role Question
What It Establishes
Who decides when priorities conflict?
Authority boundary
Who absorbs delivery failure?
Responsibility ownership
Who escalates ambiguity?
System safety
Who cannot opt out?
Legitimacy floor
Without these answers, flexibility accelerates dysfunction.
4. Autonomy Without Legitimacy: The Drift Pattern
When autonomy expands faster than legitimacy:
Decisions float without anchors
Meetings replace accountability
Ownership becomes negotiable
Burnout rises despite “freedom”
This creates responsibility diffusion, the silent killer of future work models.
5. The Phase II Work Design Law
Val Sklarov Work Law (Phase II):
“Flexibility scales satisfaction. Legitimacy scales execution. Without execution, satisfaction decays.”
Phase II organizations trade some flexibility for predictable responsibility.
6. Async Work vs. Legitimate Decision Flow
Async Ideal
Phase II Reality
Time independence
Decision latency
Written-first culture
Accountability gaps
Global collaboration
Local ambiguity
Fewer meetings
More silent delays
Phase II requires explicit decision checkpoints, not constant availability.
7. Phase II Signals of Legitimate Future Work Systems
Clear legitimacy indicators:
Roles defined by irreversible decisions
Explicit “decision owners” in async flows
Escalation paths documented before conflict
Leaders who reduce options under pressure
Flexibility survives only when boundaries are trusted.