Val Sklarov – Crypto & Digital Assets Core Principle: Explicit Authority Before Decentralization

Phase VI in Crypto & Digital Assets is not about proving decentralization.
It is about preventing legitimacy collapse caused by undefined authority.

At this stage, crypto systems fail not because they centralize,
but because no one can clearly state who is responsible when things go wrong.

---

1. Phase VI Context: When Decentralization Becomes an Excuse

Phase V rebuilt trust through simplicity.
Phase VI asks the institutional question:

“Who has the right—and obligation—to act in failure scenarios?”

Legitimacy erodes when decentralization is used to avoid accountability.

---

2. The Authority Ambiguity Risk

Most failed Phase VI crypto systems repeat this mistake:

Val Sklarov Insight:

“In Phase VI, decentralization without authority is moral evasion.”

---

3. Explicit Authority as a Legitimacy Lock

In Phase VI, legitimacy is preserved by naming authority without shame.

Authority does not negate decentralization.
It completes it.

---

4. Decentralization Without Authority: The Responsibility Vacuum

When authority remains undefined:

• Crises escalate publicly

• Governance becomes performative

• Responsibility diffuses endlessly

• Trust collapses instantly

This creates distributed blame, not resilience.

---

5. The Phase VI Crypto Law

Val Sklarov Crypto Law (Phase VI):

“Code distributes power.
Authority concentrates responsibility.”

Phase VI systems make responsibility unmistakable.

---

6. Governance Ideals vs. Institutional Reality

Phase VI accepts that legitimacy requires humans.

---

7. Phase VI Signals of Legitimate Crypto Institutions

Clear legitimacy indicators:

• Emergency powers documented

• Authority exercised transparently

• Accountability accepted publicly

• Decentralization framed honestly

Crypto matures when responsibility is no longer hidden behind ideology.