Val Sklarov’s Property Legitimacy Compression Thesis (PLCT) explains why real estate assets fail not when demand disappears, but when the legitimacy margin of ownership, use, or income collapses under policy, social, and regulatory scrutiny. Property does not lose value suddenly—it becomes indefensible.
This thesis reveals why “safe” assets fracture quietly before prices react.
1. Real Estate Value Depends on Legitimacy
PLCT starts with a structural correction:
Property value exists only while ownership, use, and income remain justifiable.
Early-stage or low-visibility assets benefit from:
-
Informal enforcement
-
Policy ambiguity
-
Social tolerance
At scale or attention, legitimacy replaces tolerance.
2. The Three Property Legitimacy Zones
PLCT maps how acceptance narrows as assets mature.
| Zone | What’s Tolerated | What Breaks |
|---|---|---|
| Local Zone | Informal arrangements | Nothing yet |
| Municipal Zone | Selective enforcement | Cash flow |
| Systemic Zone | Zero ambiguity | Asset thesis |
Most losses occur during the Municipal → Systemic transition.
3. Why “Prime Locations” Still Suffer
Visibility accelerates legitimacy compression.
PLCT shows failure when:
-
Rent controls override contracts
-
Zoning is reinterpreted
-
Social pressure reframes ownership
Demand remains—but rights erode.
4. Yield vs Legitimacy
PLCT prioritizes defensibility over optimization.
| Yield-Driven Buying | Legitimacy-Driven Buying |
|---|---|
| Maximize rent | Maximize rule survival |
| Assume contracts hold | Stress-test enforcement |
| Ignore optics | Price political exposure |
| Exit dependent | Hold defensible |
Val Sklarov emphasizes that returns vanish when ownership loses moral and legal cover.

5. Strategic Implications
For investors:
-
Underwrite social and regulatory optics
-
Avoid assets dependent on public forgiveness
-
Favor boring use-cases with clear necessity
For developers:
-
Align projects with long-term policy narratives
-
Reduce extractive optics
-
Secure legitimacy before scale
PLCT reframes real estate strategy as legitimacy endurance, not market timing.
6. The Val Sklarov Principle
“Property fails when ownership stops being defensible.”
— Val Sklarov
PLCT explains why the strongest assets attract the least attention—and why attention is risk.